Murray, Cantwell Demand Answers Following Reports of Pregnant Women Seeking Asylum Mistreated in CBP Custody

Pregnant Women Say They Miscarried In Immigration Detention And Didn’t Get The Care They Needed – MORE HERE from BuzzFeed News 

Senators: “We should not need to point out that this treatment is absolutely unacceptable”

WASHINGTON, DC – Last week, U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee and the top Democrat on the Senate health committee, and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) sent a letter to Acting Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Mark A. Morgan demanding information on the treatment of pregnant women in CBP custody. The letter follows reports of detained pregnant women being mistreated, denied medical care, and shackled by CBP, which resulted in miscarriages. Prior to a 2017 policy change by the Trump Administration, CBP policy created a presumption against detaining pregnant individuals except in exceptional circumstance.

“We have recently been made aware of extremely disturbing reports that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials are mistreating pregnant migrants in CBP custody,” the Senators wrote. “These reports, combined with public reporting that CBP is returning pregnant asylum seekers to Mexico in contravention even of the deeply-flawed Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), raises serious concerns for the health and safety of these individuals. We request your prompt response to the questions outlined in this letter.”

Despite these reports, CBP has been evasive in response to congressional oversight. When asked to share instances of restraining or shackling pregnant women, CBP claimed that the practice is “exceedingly rare,” but also claimed that they do not track instances of shackling or restraining pregnant women—bringing in to question how often it is truly taking place. Additionally, this contradicts CBP’s claim that they are in compliance with the 2015 National Standards on Transportation, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS) policy, which requires all instances of shackling or detaining pregnant detainees to be tracked. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has repeatedly warned that shackling of pregnant individuals can, “put the health of the [pregnant person] and fetus at risk.”

Senator Murray has consistently stood up to President Trump’s needlessly cruel immigration policies, proposing a bill to stop president Trump from shackling pregnant women and demanding improved treatment of transgender people in CBP custody. In July 2019, Murray and Cantwell joined colleagues to introduce the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, which would bring the appalling treatment of migrant children and families under the Trump administration to an end. Senator Murray has also been a strong champion for comprehensive immigration reform and other efforts to support the fair treatment of refugees and those seeking asylum, including introducing the Refugee Protection Act, fighting back against the Trump Administration’s efforts to limit refugee resettlement in the U.S., and demanding President Trump put an end to his Remain in Mexico policy, which unnecessarily places asylum seekers in danger.

Senator Cantwell has also stood up to the Trump administration’s immigration policies. In October 2019, she joined colleagues in pressing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General to investigate the use of solitary confinement at the Northwest Detention Center (NWDC) in Tacoma, and in 2018, she and Murray called for an investigation into conditions at the NWDC. Cantwell also worked with Murray to demand an investigation into the treatment of children separated from their parents at the border and has repeatedly pressed administration officials, including Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, on the administration’s cruel policies.

A copy of the letter can be found HERE and below:

The Honorable Mark A. Morgan
Acting Commissioner
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
1300 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20229

Dear Acting Commissioner Morgan,

We have recently been made aware of extremely disturbing reports that CBP officers are mistreating pregnant migrants in CBP custody.^[1] These reports, combined with public reporting that CBP is returning pregnant asylum seekers to Mexico in contravention of the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), raises serious concerns for the health and safety of these individuals.^[2] We request your prompt response to the questions outlined in this letter. 

According to a DHS Inspector General Complaint submitted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the abuses include a CBP officer slamming a woman who was six-months pregnant repeatedly into a fence and denial of medical care to at least three pregnant detainees. All three women described pleading with CBP officers to be taken to a doctor or the ability to access clean clothes and unspoiled food. CBP officers refused to take them seriously, with one reportedly responding: “Don’t be so dramatic.”^[3] As a result, at least one woman miscarried.^[4] We should not need to point out that this treatment is absolutely unacceptable.

These reports are especially infuriating in light of CBP’s evasion of congressional oversight. In March 2019, in questions for the record submitted following an oversight hearing,^[5] Senator Blumenthal requested that CBP provide “a list of every documented instance in the past two years of a CBP officer restraining or shackling a pregnant woman.” CBP responded that it “cannot provide this data as the agency does not have a mechanism in place for tracking this information.”^[6]

This response raises serious questions. First, in explaining CBP’s opposition to a categorical ban on shackling pregnant individuals in detention, CBP stated that “this action is exceedingly rare.”^[7] CBP cannot claim that shackling pregnant individuals is “rare” when it also claims that it does not keep records on those instances. How does CBP know how often this happens if it does not have a “mechanism in place for tracking this information”? Indeed, public reporting indicates that shackling pregnant migrants “around their hands, legs, and belly,” especially while being transported between holding centers, may very well be a regular occurrence.^[8] Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2020 prohibits the use of funds for placing restraints on women in DHS custody who are  pregnant, absent an individualized determination that the woman is a serious flight risk or immediate and serious risk to herself or others. It is unclear how CBP can ensure compliance with this requirement without adequate records.

Second, CBP claimed that it is in compliance with the 2015 National Standards on Transportation, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS) policy, which, as CBP noted in its response, requires that all instances of restraining or shackling pregnant detainees “must be documented in the appropriate electronic system(s) of record, including the facts and the reasoning behind the decision.”^[9]

If CBP were in compliance with TEDS, then it would have records about each instance of shackling or restraining pregnant migrants in custody. Either CBP is not in compliance with TEDS or these records do exist. If the former, then we urge CBP to ensure that it complies with this policy as soon as possible. If the latter, we renew our request for records pertaining to each instance that CBP has used shackles or restraints on pregnant individuals. In light of reports that CBP officers are mistreating pregnant detainees, we are especially disturbed by the prospect that CBP is not complying with pre-existing obligations to monitor how it is treating pregnant people in its custody.

Even in the absence of TEDS, we trust that CBP would want to be fully informed about how often it is restraining pregnant migrants. As you know, this practice can have tragic consequences. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has long warned that use of restraints can “put the health of the [pregnant person] and fetus at risk” by increasing the chances of developing blood clots, interfering with the ability of medical professionals to treat preeclampsia and other potentially fatal complications, and preventing pregnant individuals from being able to break their falls.^[10] Indeed, up until 2017, it was CBP policy to never detain pregnant individuals barring exceptional circumstances. Since the Trump administration’s decision to reverse that policy, the rate of miscarriages reported in CBP and ICE custody has nearly doubled.^[11]

Given the medical consensus that shackling “not only compromise[s] health care but is demeaning and rarely necessary,”^[12] we hope that CBP is using the practice exceedingly rarely and is, in fact, currently keeping records on each instance of shackling or restraining pregnant migrants in its custody. If not, we urge you to do so as quickly as possible.

We request answers to the following questions no later than February 28, 2020:

1. Does CBP keep records of each instance of shackling a pregnant detainee, as required by TEDS? If not, why not?

1. If CBP does not keep those records, has CBP conducted an analysis of how that practice is consistent with TEDS? If so, please provide that analysis.
2. If CBP does keep those records, please provide them.

2. Does CBP keep records on the rates of miscarriages and other pregnancy-related complications that CBP detainees experience in or as a result of CBP custody? If not, why not? If yes, please provide those records.
3. Does CBP keep records of complaints by pregnant detainees about mistreatment by CBP officers? If not, will you commit to doing so?
4. How does the agency hold CBP officers who mistreat detainees in their custody accountable?
5. How many CBP officers have been disciplined for mistreating pregnant detainees in the last three years? How many CBP officers have been fired for mistreating pregnant detainees in the last three years?
6. Is CBP in compliance with requirements to make individualized determinations any time a pregnant detainee is placed in restraints?
7. What guidance or training exists for CBP officers with respect to applying MPP to pregnant individuals? Please provide documentation of any such guidance or training.
8. Has CBP entered pregnant individuals into the MPP program?

Thank you for your attention to this important matter. If you have any questions, please contact Charlotte Schwartz in Sen. Blumenthal’s office (Charlotte_Schwartz@blumenthal.senate.gov).

Sincerely,

###