Senator Murray today introduced legislation to rescind President Trump’s executive order to federal agencies to collect information about citizenship status
Bill follows Senator Murray’s letter to Commerce Secretary Ross and Attorney General Barr slamming Trump’s executive order, turn over citizenship data to President Trump
(Washington, D.C.) – U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) joined a group of senators standing up to President Trump’s recent executive action, which orders federal agencies to turn over citizenship data from existing government records in order to be used for political purposes. To this end, Senator Murray introduced new legislation, supported by 13 senators, to overturn Trump’s executive order, and also joined 14 senators in a letter to Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and U.S. Attorney General William Barr warning that the Senate could restrict federal funds that could be used to implement the executive order should executive agencies follow through with the president’s directive.
“The president’s attempt to sustain the controversy over citizenship data in the decennial census—which is the basis for allocating federal funding and congressional and legislative districts—makes clear that his purpose is not a robust 2020 Census, but rather a partisan and discriminatory attack on people living in our country,” The senators wrote in the letter to Secretary Ross and Attorney General Barr. “Our government must never use decennial census data to otherize, separate, or disenfranchise people living in our country.”
Senator Murray’s latest moves follow her previous efforts to stop the administration from obtaining and weaponizing citizenship data, including joining a group of 20 senators in writing to the Commerce Department’s inspector general in October 2018 asking for a review of President Trump’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census at the last minute.
Read the full text of the letter below and HERE.
Dear Secretary Ross and Attorney General Barr:
The executive order directing federal agencies to compile citizenship data through administrative records and merge it with decennial census data is a blatant effort to collect this information for political and discriminatory purposes. We write in strong opposition to this attempt to inappropriately mix this administration’s harmful immigration policies with the ordinarily nonpartisan decennial census and nonpartisan work of federal statistical agencies generally. Furthermore, we will work to prohibit the Department of Commerce, or any other agency, from using federal funds to carry out this action.
Litigation surrounding the administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census form, as well as documents from a partisan operative recently disclosed as part of that litigation, revealed that the proposal to collect citizenship information was designed both to depress the 2020 Census count and to be “advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites” and “clearly be a disadvantage to the Democrats” in gerrymandering efforts. Furthermore, in his remarks on the proposed citizenship question, Attorney General Barr raised the possibility that these data could be used to change the population base used for congressional apportionment—a purpose, we should note, that would blatantly violate the U.S. Constitution’s apportionment clause.
In addition, the president justified his executive order by citing the use of citizenship data for immigration and other public policy purposes, stating, for example, that “data on the number of citizens and aliens in the country is needed to help us understand the effects of immigration on our country and to inform policymakers considering basic decisions about immigration policy,” and that “[t]he Federal Government’s need for a more accurate count of illegal aliens in the country is only made more acute by the recent massive influx of illegal immigrants at our southern border.”
The president’s executive order bypasses the successful legal challenges to the citizenship question and forces this information into 2020 Census data using methods that have not been reviewed for accuracy, legality, and feasibility. This is an unlawful overreach of executive authority. The failed attempt to add a citizenship question clearly illustrated the true intent of this administration to assist discriminatory redistricting, apportionment, and public policy decisions that harm communities of color, and particularly immigrant populations.
The president’s attempt to sustain the controversy over citizenship data in the decennial census—which is the basis for allocating federal funding and congressional and legislative districts—makes clear that his purpose is not a robust 2020 Census, but rather a partisan and discriminatory attack on people living in our country. Our government must never use decennial census data to otherize, separate, or disenfranchise people living in our country.
Sincerely,
###
English 
Spanish